Threats posed to the fragile and pristine marine turtle (loggerhead & leatherback) eggs in the Maputaland coastline: a cross-sectional ecological assessment.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v7i3.1980Keywords:
Loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta), Leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea), Maputaland coastline, Sea turtle conservation, Nesting success, Marine Protected Areas (MPAs), Turtle monitoring programme, Poaching and human disturbanceAbstract
Background
The Maputaland coastline in northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, is a critical nesting habitat for the endangered Loggerhead (Caretta caretta) and Leatherback (Dermochelys coriacea) turtles. Despite its protected status, this region is increasingly exposed to anthropogenic pressures and environmental stressors that threaten turtle nesting success and egg survival. This study assessed key threats affecting marine turtle reproduction within the Maputaland Marine Protected Area (MPA).
Methods
A cross-sectional ecological assessment was conducted between November 2023 and March 2024, corresponding with the peak turtle nesting season. Data were collected along a 30 km stretch of coastline and included nest counts, hatchling success rates, records of physical disturbances (e.g., erosion and storm surges), observations of human activities (e.g., poaching, tourism, off-road vehicle tracks), and semi-structured interviews with conservation officers and local community members. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative data were analysed thematically.
Results
The overall hatchling success rate was 58%, with significantly lower success observed in areas experiencing high levels of human disturbance. Illegal poaching was responsible for 23% of recorded nest disturbances. Additional threats included artificial coastal lighting causing hatchling disorientation, dune erosion, and off-road vehicle activity. Qualitative findings revealed low public awareness of conservation legislation and the continued cultural consumption of turtle eggs. Conservation personnel highlighted limited patrol capacity and insufficient community outreach as major constraints to effective protection.
Conclusion
Both anthropogenic activities and natural stressors are undermining marine turtle reproductive success along the Maputaland coastline.
Recommendations
Community-based conservation approaches incorporating environmental education, strengthened enforcement of MPA regulations, turtle-friendly lighting, and sustainable eco-tourism practices are essential. Collaborative co-management involving local communities, conservation authorities, and academic institutions is critical for long-term turtle conservation and ecosystem resilience.
References
Bachoo, S., Harris, L.R., Nel, R. et al., 2018. Managing conflicts between economic activities and threatened migratory marine species toward creating a multi-objective blue economy. Conservation Biology, 32(2), pp.411-423. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12992.https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12992
Chaloupka, M., Kamezaki, N. & Limpus, C.J., 2008. Is climate change affecting the population dynamics of the endangered Pacific loggerhead turtle? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 356(1-2), pp.136-143. DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.04.020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2007.12.009
Flint, M., 2015. Sea turtle rehabilitation: global perspectives on practice and research. Journal of Marine Animals and Their Ecology, 8(1), pp.1-10. DOI.
Foley, A.M., Schroeder, B.A. & MacPherson, S.L., 2006. Post nesting migrations and resident areas of Florida loggerhead turtles. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 5(2), pp.231-236. DOI: (not found).
Frazier, J.G., 1980. Exploitation of marine turtles in the Indian Ocean. Human Ecology, 8(4), pp.329-370. DOI. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01560999
Hawkes, L.A., Broderick, A.C., Godfrey, M.H. & Godley, B.J., 2008. Climate change and marine turtles. Endangered Species Research, 7(2), pp.137-154. DOI: 10.3354/esr00198. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00198
Hughes, G.R., 1967. On the breeding of the green turtle Chelonia mydas on the coast of South Africa. Lammergeyer, 7, pp.5-8.
Hughes, G.R., 1998. Tag returns and migration of loggerhead turtles. Marine Turtle Newsletter, 82, pp.7-8.
IUCN Red List entry: Wallace, B.P., Tiwari, M. & Girondot, M., 2011. Dermochelys coriacea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T6494A12852981. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org (Accessed 9 June 2025). DOI: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2011 1.RLTS.T6494A12852981.en.
Johannes, R.E., 1981. Words of the Lagoon: Fishing and Marine Lore in the Palau District of Micronesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lombard, A.T. et al., 2010. Changes in benthic fauna patterns and abrasive fish mortality following closure of trawling grounds within Algoa Bay, South Africa. African Journal of Marine Science, 32(1), pp.107-121. DOI: 10.2989/1814232X.2010.481948.
Mazaris, A.D., Kallimanis, A.S., Tzanopoulos, J., Sgardelis, S.P. & Pantis, J.D., 2009. Sea surface temperature variations in core foraging grounds drive nesting trends and phenology of loggerhead turtles. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 379(1-2), pp.23-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.07.010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2009.07.026
Nel, R., Punt, A.E., Hughes, G.R. & Ludynia, K., 2013. Migration ecology of loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) at their southernmost nesting locality, South Africa. Endangered Species Research, 21, pp.169-180. DOI: 10.3354/esr00513.
Spotila, J.R., 2004. Sea Turtles: A Complete Guide to Their Biology, Behavior, and Conservation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tisdell, C. & Wilson, C., 2001. Economics of wildlife tourism. Wildlife Tourism Research Report Series, 13. CRC for Sustainable Tourism.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sibonelo Thanda Mbanjwa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
















