Changing antibiogram profile of Acinetobacter baumannii in diabetic and non-diabetic foot ulcer infections: A comparative observational study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i12.2465Keywords:
Acinetobacter baumannii, diabetic foot infection, foot ulcer, antibiogram, multidrug resistance, colistin, tigecyclineAbstract
Background:
Diabetic foot infections represent a major cause of hospitalization, limb loss, and antimicrobial exposure worldwide. Their microbiological landscape is increasingly dominated by multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms. Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as a clinically significant pathogen in chronic wounds and healthcare-associated infections, frequently exhibiting extensive resistance and narrowing therapeutic choices.
Objectives:
To compare the antimicrobial susceptibility profile and multidrug-resistant (MDR) burden of Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from infected foot ulcers in diabetic and non-diabetic patients.
Methods:
This comparative observational study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, NIMRA Institute of Medical Sciences, Jupudi, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India, from May to October 2025. A total of 100 patients with clinically infected foot ulcers were enrolled, including 60 diabetics and 40 non-diabetics. Wound specimens were processed using standard culture techniques, and isolates were identified by conventional microbiological methods. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed according to standard guidelines. MDR was defined as non-susceptibility to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial classes.
Results:
The mean age of participants was 56.2 ± 10.8 years, and 68% were male. Diabetic patients had longer ulcer duration (median 18 vs 9 days). Resistance to ceftazidime and ceftriaxone was higher in diabetic than non-diabetic isolates (88.3% vs 70.0% and 83.3% vs 65.0%, respectively). Carbapenem resistance was 41.7% vs 25.0%, and amikacin resistance was 55.0% vs 37.5%. Colistin and tigecycline retained susceptibility above 90% in both groups. MDR prevalence was higher in diabetics (29/60, 48.3%) than in non-diabetics (11/40, 27.5%; Fisher’s exact p = 0.041).
Conclusion:
Acinetobacter baumannii from diabetic foot ulcers exhibited a substantially higher resistance burden and MDR frequency. Colistin and tigecycline remained the most effective therapeutic options.
Recommendations:
Strengthen antimicrobial stewardship, implement routine local antibiogram surveillance, optimize wound care, and enforce strict infection control practices.
References
Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, Pile JC, Peters EJG, Armstrong DG, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):e132-e173. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis346
Lipsky BA, Senneville É, Abbas ZG, Aragón-Sánchez J, Diggle M, Embil JM, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of foot infection in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2019 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Mar;36(Suppl 1):e3280. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3280
Senneville É, Lipsky BA, Abbas ZG, van Asten SA, Albalawi Z, Aragón-Sánchez J, et al. IWGDF/IDSA guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diabetes-related foot infections (IWGDF/IDSA 2023). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3687. https://doi.org/10.1002/dmrr.3687
Kale DS, Karande GS, Datkhile KD. Diabetic foot ulcer in India: aetiological trends and bacterial diversity. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Mar-Apr;27(2):107-114. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.ijem_458_22
Saseedharan S, Sahu M, Chaddha R, Pathrose E, Bal A, Bhalekar P, et al. Epidemiology of diabetic foot infections in a reference tertiary hospital in India. Braz J Microbiol. 2018 Apr-Jun;49(2):401-406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.09.003
Sannathimmappa MB, Nambiar V, Aravindakshan R, Al Khabori MSJ, Al-Flaiti AHS, Al-Azri KNM, et al. Diabetic foot infections: profile and antibiotic susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates in a tertiary care hospital of Oman. J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Jul 30;10:254. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1552_20
Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H. An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Dec;5(12):939-951. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1789
Peleg AY, Seifert H, Paterson DL. Acinetobacter baumannii: emergence of a successful pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008 Jul;21(3):538-582. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00058-07
Howard A, O'Donoghue M, Feeney A, Sleator RD. Acinetobacter baumannii: an emerging opportunistic pathogen. Virulence. 2012 May 1;3(3):243-250. https://doi.org/10.4161/viru.19700
Poirel L, Nordmann P. Carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: mechanisms and epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2006 Sep;12(9):826-836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01456.x
Pogue JM, Mann T, Barber KE, Kaye KS. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: epidemiology, surveillance and management. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2013 Apr;11(4):383-393. https://doi.org/10.1586/eri.13.14
Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012 Mar;18(3):268-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03570.x
Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK. Colistin: the revival of polymyxins for the management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2005 May 1;40(9):1333-1341. https://doi.org/10.1086/429323
Karageorgopoulos DE, Kelesidis T, Kelesidis I, Falagas ME. Tigecycline for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (including carbapenem-resistant) Acinetobacter infections: a review of the scientific evidence. 2008 Jul;62(1):45-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkn165
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr. Srinivas Karri, Dr. K. Meenakshi, Dr. J. Balakrishna, Dr. Bindu Madhavi. K

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
















