Sevoflurane–fentanyl versus propofol–fentanyl for tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents in elective surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Dr Katroth  Rekha; Dharavath  Ramu; Kota  Raju

doi:10.51168/sjhrafrica.v7i3.2438

Authors

Dr Katroth Rekha Senior Resident, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India
Dharavath Ramu Assistent Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Gandhi Medical College, Secunderabad, Telangana, India
Kota Raju Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Narayanpet, Telangana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v7i3.2438

Keywords:

sevoflurane, propofol, fentanyl, tracheal intubation;, muscle relaxant-free, elective surgery, hemodynamics

Abstract

Background

Objectives: To compare sevoflurane–fentanyl versus propofol–fentanyl for tracheal intubation without a muscle relaxant and to assess intubating conditions, laryngoscopic view, apnea, and hemodynamic responses.

Methods

This prospective comparative observational study enrolled 80 ASA I–II adults over 18 months. After fentanyl 2 ug/kg, Group P received propofol 3 mg/kg IV with intubation at 90 seconds, while Group S underwent incremental sevoflurane induction up to 8% with intubation at 5 minutes. Intubating conditions were graded as optimal/good/poor/inadequate, Cormack–Lehane grade was recorded, and apnea was documented. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded at baseline, after induction, after intubation, and at 1 and 5 minutes. Group comparisons used the t-test and chi-square.

Results

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Optimal intubating conditions were achieved more frequently with sevoflurane (92.5%) than with propofol (52.5%), while acceptable conditions were observed in 100% and 82.5% of patients, respectively. Apnea occurred in 12.5% of patients in the sevoflurane group compared with 100% in the propofol group. Laryngoscopic view was comparable between the groups. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure remained similar throughout the observation period. However, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure were significantly higher in the sevoflurane group at 1 and 5 minutes after intubation compared with the propofol group (p < 0.05), although the values remained within clinically acceptable limits in both groups.

Conclusion

Sevoflurane–fentanyl provided superior intubating conditions with markedly lower apnea incidence and acceptable hemodynamic stability compared with propofol–fentanyl for tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blockade.

Recommendations

In ASA I–II elective cases where a muscle relaxant-free approach is planned, sevoflurane–fentanyl can be considered to optimize intubating conditions and reduce apnea, with continuous monitoring and readiness for rescue neuromuscular blockade.

References

Woods AW, Allam S. Tracheal intubation without the use of neuromuscular blocking agents. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;94(2):150-8. doi:10.1093/bja/aei006.

Lundstrøm LH, Duez CH, Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Thomsen JL, Møller AM, et al. Avoidance versus use of neuromuscular blocking agents for improving conditions during tracheal intubation or direct laryngoscopy in adults and adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 17;5(5):CD009237. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009237.pub2.

Combes X, Andriamifidy L, Dufresne E, Suen P, Sauvat S, Scherrer E, et al. Comparison of two induction regimens using or not using muscle relaxant: impact on postoperative upper airway discomfort. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Aug;99(2):276-81. doi:10.1093/bja/aem147.

Mencke T, Jacobs RM, Machmueller S, Sauer M, Heidecke C, Kallert A, et al. Intubating conditions and side effects of propofol, remifentanil and sevoflurane compared with propofol, remifentanil and rocuronium: a randomised, prospective, clinical trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 May 22;14:39. doi:10.1186/1471-2253-14-39.

Katoh T, Nakajima Y, Moriwaki G, Kobayashi S, Suzuki A, Iwamoto T, et al. Sevoflurane requirements for tracheal intubation with and without fentanyl. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Apr;82(4):561-5. doi:10.1093/bja/82.4.561.

Joo HS, Perks WJ, Belo SE. Sevoflurane with remifentanil allows rapid tracheal intubation without neuromuscular blocking agents. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Jul-Aug;48(7):646-50. doi:10.1007/BF03016197.

van Twest RM. Bispectral index guided timing of intubation without neuromuscular blockade during sevoflurane induction of anaesthesia in adults. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006 Oct;34(5):606-12. doi:10.1177/0310057X0603400517.

Scheller MS, Zornow MH, Saidman LJ. Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: a technique using propofol and varying doses of alfentanil. Anesth Analg. 1992 Nov;75(5):788-93. doi:10.1213/00000539-199211000-00024.

Tsuda A, Yasumoto S, Akazawa T, Nakahara T. [Tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants using propofol and varying doses of fentanyl]. Masui. 2001 Oct;50(10):1129-32.

Jabbour-Khoury SI, Dabbous AS, Rizk LB, Abou Jalad NM, Bartelmaos TE, El-Khatib MF, et al. A combination of alfentanil-lidocaine-propofol provides better intubating conditions than fentanyl-lidocaine-propofol in the absence of muscle relaxants. Can J Anaesth. 2003 Feb;50(2):116-20. doi: 10.1007/BF03017841. PMID: 12560299.

Prakash S, Arora D, Prakash S, Bhartiya V, Singh R. A combination of fentanyl-midazolam-propofol provides better intubating conditions than fentanyl-lignocaine-propofol in the absence of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Sep;50(8):999-1004. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01093.x.

Bouvet L, Stoian A, Jacquot-Laperrière S, Allaouchiche B, Chassard D, Boselli E. Laryngeal injuries and intubating conditions with or without muscular relaxation: an equivalence study. Can J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;55(10):674-84. doi:10.1007/BF03017743.

Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11.

Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI, Gramstad L, Jensen E, Jensen FS, et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Jan;40(1):59-74. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1996.tb04389.x.