Consequences Of Fetal Growth Restriction Due To Maternal High-Risk Factors On Neonatal Outcome With 1 Year Follow Up In A Tertiary Care Hospital

Authors

  • Rizwan Ahmar Additional Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India
  • Manish Kumar  Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India
  • Amit Kumar  Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India
  • Sadia Parween Associate Professor, Department Of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IGIMS, Patna, India
  • Sunil Kishore  Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India
  • Anand Kumar Gupta Additional Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i6.1758

Keywords:

Fetal growth restriction, maternal risk factors, neonatal outcomes, developmental delay

Abstract

Background: Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a significant perinatal concern associated with increased neonatal morbidity and long-term pediatric complications. Maternal high-risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, malnutrition, and infections are known contributors to FGR.

Objectives:

  • To evaluate the consequences of FGR in neonates born to mothers with high-risk conditions in a tertiary care setting.
  • To evaluate the pediatric outcome after 1 year follow up.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at IGIMS, Patna, over 1.5 years involving 92 FGR neonates. Maternal risk factors and neonatal outcomes were recorded, with follow-up assessments up to 12 months to evaluate growth and development.

Results: Hypertensive disorders (52.2%) and diabetes mellitus (19.6%) were the most common maternal risk factors. Common neonatal complications included hypoglycemia (37.0%), respiratory distress (31.5%), and NICU admissions (55.4%). At 12 months, 29.3% had delayed milestones, and 33.7% showed persistent growth impairment. Significant correlations were found between maternal conditions and adverse pediatric outcomes.

Conclusion: Maternal high-risk conditions significantly affect both immediate and long-term outcomes in FGR neonates. Early antenatal intervention and structured pediatric follow-up are essential to improve prognosis.

Author Biographies

Rizwan Ahmar, Additional Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India

              

Manish Kumar,  Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India

 

 

Amit Kumar,  Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India

                       

Anand Kumar Gupta, Additional Professor, Department of Pediatric, IGIMS, Patna, India

 

References

Baschat AA. Fetal growth restriction–from observation to intervention. J Perinat Med. 2010;38(3):239–246. doi:10.1515/jpm.2010.035

Figueras F, Gratacós E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2014;36(2):86–98. doi:10.1159/000357592

Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A. Clinical update: Fetal growth restriction. Lancet. 2022;400(10360):1737–1748. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01736-6

Melamed N, Baschat A, Yinon Y, et al. FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) initiative on fetal growth: best practice advice for screening, diagnosis, and management of fetal growth restriction. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021;152 Suppl 1:3–57. doi:10.1002/ijgo.13575

Bernstein IM, Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Ohlsson A, Golan A. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;182(1 Pt 1):198–206. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(00)70513-8

Sharma D, Shastri S, Sharma P. Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clin Med Insights Pediatr. 2016;10:67 83. doi:10.4137/CMPed.S40070

Reddy UM, Abuhamad AZ, Levine D, Saade GR. Fetal growth restriction: evaluation and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(2):B2–B15. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.042

Bhatia A, Dutta S, Narang A. Longitudinal growth and neurodevelopmental outcome of very low birth weight infants at 18 to 24 months of corrected age. Indian Pediatr. 2021;58(2):123–128.

Villar J, Papageorghiou AT, Pang R, et al. The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non-isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. BJOG. 2014;121 Suppl 1:28–40. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12631

Lee ACC, Kozuki N, Blencowe H, et al. Intrauterine growth restriction–associated neonatal mortality: An individual-level meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017;14(1):e1002244. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002244

Published

2025-06-01

How to Cite

Ahmar, R. ., Kumar, M. ., Kumar, A. ., Parween, S. ., Kishore, S. ., & Gupta, A. K. . (2025). Consequences Of Fetal Growth Restriction Due To Maternal High-Risk Factors On Neonatal Outcome With 1 Year Follow Up In A Tertiary Care Hospital. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 6(6). https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i6.1758

Issue

Section

Section of Pediatrics and Child Health

Most read articles by the same author(s)