Evaluation of pathological fractures in orthopaedic practice with emphasis on histopathology and anaesthetic challenges: a hospital-based cross-sectional study.

Authors

  • Dr. Kandukuri Arun Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India
  • Dr. Annam Sadhana Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India
  • Dr. Radhika Chendragiri Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v7i2.2812

Keywords:

Pathological fracture, Orthopaedic oncology, Histopathology, Metastatic bone disease, Anaesthesia, Perioperative complications, Bone tumour

Abstract

Background

Pathological fractures occur through structurally weakened bone and require coordinated orthopaedic stabilization, histopathological diagnosis, and careful anaesthetic management.

Objectives

To evaluate the clinical profile, histopathological spectrum, orthopaedic management, anaesthetic challenges, and perioperative complications among patients presenting with pathological fractures

Methods

A hospital-based descriptive cross-sectional study included 100 consecutive patients with pathological or impending pathological fractures treated at Government Medical College and Government General Hospital, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India, from November 2025 to April 2026. Clinical characteristics, fracture site, histopathological diagnosis, orthopaedic treatment, anaesthetic technique, anaesthetic challenges, and perioperative complications were collected using a structured proforma and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results

The mean age was 44.8 ± 17.6 years, and 58.0% of patients were male. Fractures followed trivial trauma in 63.0% of cases, while 21.0% occurred spontaneously and 16.0% were impending fractures. The femur was the most commonly affected bone (48.0%). Malignant lesions accounted for 65.0% of cases, with metastatic carcinoma comprising 38.0% of all diagnoses. Internal fixation was the most common surgical procedure (43.0%). General anaesthesia was used in 52.0% of patients, followed by regional anaesthesia (36.0%). Anaesthetic challenges occurred in 62.0% of patients, mainly preoperative anaemia (34.0%), cardiopulmonary comorbidities (28.0%), anticipated major blood loss (25.0%), and positioning difficulties (22.0%). Perioperative complications were reported in 29.0%, most commonly blood transfusion (18.0%), severe postoperative pain (14.0%), and intraoperative hypotension (12.0%). No intraoperative deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Malignant bone disease, particularly metastatic carcinoma, was the leading cause of pathological fractures. Histopathological confirmation guided definitive management, while the high prevalence of anaesthetic challenges and perioperative complications highlights the importance of multidisciplinary care and individualized perioperative planning.

Recommendations

Early multidisciplinary assessment, timely biopsy, optimization of anaemia, adequate blood product preparation, and structured postoperative analgesia are recommended to improve patient outcomes.

Author Biographies

Dr. Kandukuri Arun, Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India

is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India. His academic interests include diagnostic pathology, histopathology, cytopathology, and clinicopathological correlation in medical research.

Dr. Annam Sadhana, Assistant Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India

 

is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India. Her areas of interest include clinical orthopaedics, trauma care, musculoskeletal disorders, and orthopaedic research.

Dr. Radhika Chendragiri, Assistant Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India

 

is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Rajanna Sircilla, Telangana, India. Her academic interests include perioperative anaesthesia care, regional anaesthesia, pain management, and patient safety in surgical practice. ORCID iD : https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8841-5207

References

Roodman GD. Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(16):1655-1664. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra030831

Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20 Pt 2):6243s-6249s. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931

Mirels H. Metastatic disease in long bones. A proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(249):256-264. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198912000-00027

Bryson DJ, Wicks L, Ashford RU. The investigation and management of suspected malignant pathological fractures: a review for the general orthopaedic surgeon. Injury. 2015;46(10):1891-1899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.028

Stokes CM, Elsewaisy O, Pang G, Slavin JL, Schlicht SM, Choong PFM. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography-guided biopsy in pathological fractures. ANZ J Surg. 2017;87(7-8):600-604. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.13894

Crenn V, Vezole L, Bouhamama A, Meurgey A, Karanian M, Marec-Berard P, et al. Percutaneous core needle biopsy can efficiently and safely diagnose most primary bone tumors. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(9):1552. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11091552

Wedin R, Bauer HC. Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur: endoprosthesis or reconstruction nail? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(12):1653-1657. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B12.16629

Piccioli A, Rossi B, Scaramuzzo L, Spinelli MS, Yang Z, Maccauro G. Intramedullary nailing for treatment of pathologic femoral fractures due to metastases. Injury. 2014;45(2):412-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.09.025

Angelini A, Trovarelli G, Berizzi A, Pala E, Breda A, Maraldi M, et al. Treatment of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur. Injury. 2018;49 Suppl 3:S77-S83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.044

Anderson MR, Jeng CL, Wittig JC, Rosenblatt MA. Anesthesia for patients undergoing orthopedic oncologic surgeries. J Clin Anesth. 2010;22(7):565-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.02.011

Janssen SJ, Braun Y, Ready JE, Raskin KA, Ferrone ML, Hornicek FJ, et al. Are allogeneic blood transfusions associated with decreased survival after surgery for long-bone metastatic fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(7):2343-2351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4167-3

Hard af Segerstad M, Olsen F, Patel A, Houltz E, Nellgard B, Ricksten SE. Pulmonary haemodynamics and right ventricular function in cemented vs uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(3):298-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13262

Bramer JA, Abudu AA, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Do pathological fractures influence survival and local recurrence rate in bony sarcomas? Eur J Cancer. 2007;43(13):1944-1951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.004

Hashimoto K, Nishimura S, Ito T, Kakinoki R, Goto K. Treatment outcomes of pathological fractures in patients with benign bone tumors. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025;104(7):e41584. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000041584,

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Dr. Kandukuri Arun, Dr.Annam Sadhana, & Dr. Radhika Chendragiri. (2026). Evaluation of pathological fractures in orthopaedic practice with emphasis on histopathology and anaesthetic challenges: a hospital-based cross-sectional study. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 7(2), 12. https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v7i2.2812

Issue

Section

Section of Pathology, and Histopathology