Cross-sectional study on the occurrence of menstrual disorders post-tubal sterilization.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i12.2241Keywords:
Tubal Sterilization, Menstrual Disorders, Menorrhagia, Cross-Sectional Study, ContraceptionAbstract
Background
Tubal sterilization is a common permanent contraceptive method worldwide. However, its potential long-term sequelae, particularly menstrual disorders, remain a subject of debate. This study aimed to determine the occurrence and pattern of menstrual disorders among women who underwent tubal sterilization.
Methods
A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Bhaarath Medical College and Hospital from October 2024 to October 2025. One hundred parous women aged 25-40 years who had undergone tubal sterilization at least one year prior were enrolled using a consecutive sampling technique. A pre-tested, structured questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics, surgical history, and menstrual patterns. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and percentages. The Chi-square test was used to assess associations, with p-values <0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results
The mean age of the participants was 32.4 ± 4.1 years. The overall occurrence of menstrual disorders post-sterilization was 65% (65/100). The most common disorders were menorrhagia (30%), followed by polymenorrhea (18%) and intermenstrual spotting (12%). A statistically significant association (p=0.02) was found between the type of sterilization technique and the occurrence of menorrhagia. Women with a history of postpartum sterilization reported a higher incidence of menstrual irregularities compared to those with interval sterilization (72% vs. 58%, p=0.04).
Conclusion
A high occurrence of menstrual disorders was observed among women following tubal sterilization. Menorrhagia was the most prevalent disorder.
Recommendation
Pre-sterilization counseling should include comprehensive information about the potential risk of menstrual irregularities to ensure informed decision-making.
References
Peterson HB, Pollack AE, Warshaw JS. Tubal sterilization. In: Rock JA, Jones HW, editors. Te Linde's Operative Gynecology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003. p. 537-56.
Gentile GP, Kaufman SC, Helbig DW. Is there any evidence for a post-tubal sterilization syndrome? Fertil Steril. 1998;69(2):179-86.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00229-X PMid:9496325
Moradan S, Ghorbani R. Is previous tubal ligation a risk factor for hysterectomy because of abnormal uterine bleeding? Oman Med J. 2012;27(4):326-8.https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2012.81 PMid:23071889 PMCid:PMC3464743
Deligeoroglou E, Creatsas G. Menstrual disorders. Endocr Dev. 2012;22:160-70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000331697 PMid:22846527
DeStefano F, Huezo CM, Peterson HB, Rubin GL, Layde PM, Ory HW. Menstrual changes after tubal sterilization. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;62(6):673-81.
Shobeiri MJ, Atashkhoii S. The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization: a case control study. BMC Women's Health. 2005;5:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6874-5-5 PMid:15865627 PMCid:PMC1112604
Peterson HB, Jeng G, Folger SG, Hillis SA, Marchbanks PA, Wilcox LS. The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(23):1681-7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200012073432303 PMid:11106717
Bhiwandiwala PP, Mumford SD, Feldblum PJ. Menstrual pattern changes following laparoscopic sterilization with different occlusion techniques: a review of 10,004 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;145(6):684-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(83)90574-4 PMid:6219585
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yasodha Ananthan, Abi Chandrasekaran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
















