Profile of Primary Angle Closure Disease

Authors

  • Dr. Rajyeshwar Singh Senior Resident, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences, Shri Mahant Indiresh Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
  • Dr. Manisha Gupta Professor, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences, Shri Mahant Indiresh Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
  • Dr. Priyanka Gupta Associate Professor, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical & Health Sciences, Shri Mahant Indiresh Hospital, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i9.1691

Keywords:

primary angle closure disease, Primary Angle Closure, Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma, Primary Angle Closure Disease

Abstract

Background

Glaucoma is the second most common cause of visual morbidity after Cataract. The purpose of the study is to assess the demographic and clinical profile of Primary Angle Closure Disease (PACD) and to evaluate the risk factors associated.

Method

A prospective observational study including 97 eyes of 50 patients above 40 years, with PACD at a tertiary health care centre. Aphakia, Pseudophakia, previous ocular surgery, secondary glaucoma, and ocular pathology subjects were excluded. Detailed glaucoma workup, slit-lamp examination (VH Grading), Gonioscopy, ocular biometry (Axial Length, Anterior chamber depth, lens thickness) were recorded. All patients diagnosed with PACD were prospectively categorized into three subgroups, namely Primary Angle Closure suspect (PACS), Primary Angle Closure (PAC), and Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG) using International Society of Geographical and Epidemiological Ophthalmology (ISGEO) Classification.

Results

Out of 50 subjects, 52% were males, and 58% urban residents. Mean age was 60.14±11.81 years in PACD. Out of the total 97 eyes, 39.2% (38 eyes) had PACS subtype, 38.1% (37 eyes) had PAC, and 22.7% (22 eyes) had PACG subtype. The mean standard value of axial length was22.03±0.62mm in PACS, 22.46±0.42mm in PAC & 22.41±0.71mm in PACG. Anterior chamber depth was 2.36±0.21mm in PACS, 2.33±0.12mm in PAC & 2.22±0.7mm in PACG subgroup. Lens thickness was 4.52±0.74mm in PACS, 4.54±1.07mm in PAC & 4.61±1.05mm in PACG subgroup.

Conclusion

PACS was the most common subgroup. Shallow anterior chamber, increased lens thickness, lesser axial length, and advancing age were the risk factors in PACD.

Recommendations

The present study highlights that screening of subjects can detect PACD at early stages and thus prevent potential blindness.

References

. Mariotti S. Global Data on Visual Impairments 2010. World Health Organization. 2012;20.

Quigley HA, Broman AT. Number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol2006;90:262-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.081224 PMid:16488940 PMCid:PMC1856963

Jacob A, Thomas R, Koshi SP, Braganza A, Muliyil J. Prevalence of primary glaucoma in an urban South Indian population. Indian JOphthalmol1998;46:81‑6.

Raychaudhuri A, Lahiri SK, Bandyopadhyay M, Foster PJ, Reeves BC, Johnson GJ. A population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in rural West Bengal: The West Bengal Glaucoma Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1559‑64. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.074948 PMid:16299129 PMCid:PMC1772964

George R, Ve RS, Vijaya L. Glaucoma in India: Estimated burden of disease. J Glaucoma 2010; 19:391-7.

https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181c4ac5b PMid:20711029

Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol 2002;86:238-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 PMid:11815354 PMCid:PMC1771026

Venkataratnam Peram, Srihari Atti, Srinivasprasad Killani, Sikander A. K. Lodhi, Krishnakisore Arikeri, Sridhar Goli. "Epidemiological Factors in Primary Angle Closure Disease: A Study in a Tertiary Hospital in South India". Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine and Healthcare. 2015;2(34):5279-85. https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2015/734 PMid:27004051

Paul C, Sengupta S, Banerjee S, Choudhury S. Angle closure glaucoma in rural and urban populations in eastern India-The Hooghly River Glaucoma Study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2018;66:1285-90. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_344_18

PMid:30127142 PMCid:PMC6113807

Seth, Praveen Kumar, Sirisha Senthil, Anthony Vipin, Garudadri Chandrasekar. Prevalence of glaucoma types, clinical profile, and disease severity at presentation: Tertiary Institute-based cross-sectional study from South India. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology 2023;71: 3305-12. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_3305_22 PMid:37787226 PMCid:PMC10683705

Pawar P, Bandopadhyay S, Balwir D. Clinical Profile of Patients with Primary Glaucoma in Tertiary Care Centre. MVPJ. Med. Sci. 2022; 9(1): 9-17. https://doi.org/10.18311/mvpjms/2022/v9i1/284

Ocansey S, Abu EK, Abraham CH, Owusu-Ansah A, Acheampong C, Mensah F, Darko-Takyi C, Ilechie A. Socio-demographic factors modify awareness, knowledge, and perceived risk of glaucoma in rural and urban residents in Ghana: a population-based survey. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021;15:13:2515841421998099. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515841421998099 PMid:33796815 PMCid:PMC7968030

Choudhari NS, Khanna RC, Marmamula S, Mettla AL, Giridhar P, Banerjee S et al. Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study Group. Fifteen-Year Incidence Rate of Primary Angle Closure Disease in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021;229:34-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.02.030 PMid:33667399

Senthil S, Garudadri C, Khanna RC, Sannapaneni K. Angle closure in the Andhra Pradesh Eye Disease Study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1729-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.021 PMid:20466426

Sihota R, Agarwal HC. Profile of angle closure glaucoma in North India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1998;46:25-9.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

How to Cite

singh, R. ., gupta, manisha, & Gupta, P. (2025). Profile of Primary Angle Closure Disease. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 6(9), 7. https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i9.1691

Issue

Section

Section of Ophthalmology Research