JOHN LOCKE’S THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE IN RELATION TO THE BATAGWENDA PEOPLE. A CASE OF KICHECHE SUB-COUNTY, KITAGWENDA DISTRICT, UGANDA.

Authors

  • Innocent Ampaire Uganda Marty’s National Seminary Alokolum, Gulu, a student at St. Mary National Seminary, Ggaba, a student at St. Pauls’ Major Seminary Kipalapla, Tabora, Tanzania, and a student at Makerere University. He is currently a lecturer in the Department of Religious Studies at Kampala University and a Research Fellow at Makerere University in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences. He holds an MA in Religious Studies, a BA in Theology, a BA in Philosophy, and several certificates in Research such as CITI Behavioural Research, Good Clinical Practice, and CCA.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v5i12.1443

Keywords:

Philosophy, Knowledge, Mankind, John Locke, Batagwenda, Kitagwenda

Abstract

Background

Knowledge is a set of mental and psychological capacities that make mankind a unique, morally different creature. Although all the created may have capacities of reproduction, self-care, and memory, it is only human beings who are self-conscious, rational, and autonomous, can use language, and are responsible for their actions. This study aimed to examine the theory of knowledge according to John Locke about the Batagwenda people of Kicheche Sub-County, Kita Gwenda district, Uganda.

 Methods

An explorative case study design with qualitative research approaches was used. Data was collected using a semi-structured interview guide and analyzed thematically to systematically identify, code, and report recurring patterns in a narrative form. It was augmented by a systematic literature review on the life and works of the empiricist philosopher John Locke with a focus on his theory of knowledge.

 

Results

A total of 30 participants participated in the study. It was affirmed that knowledge is a distinct attribute proper to human beings. It is obtained through sense experience, reasoning, and revelation from God. However, knowledge is limited and all ideas should be subjected to the criteria of truth and certainty.

 Conclusion

Knowledge is the highest mental and psychological faculty that defines human beings other factors notwithstanding. It is limited in nature although human beings can obtain knowledge sufficient for their functions. It is obtained in many ways including experience, reasoning, and revelation. It should be subjected to proof based on truth and certainty since it cannot be wholly grasped as it is.

 Recommendation

There should be a constant search for knowledge through interactive experiences, reading, and meditation. It requires substantiation based on truth and certainty because it is relative. It should be sought and guarded jealously because it makes human beings unique while fostering a natural tendency toward perfection.

References

Ayer, A.J. The Foundation of Empirical Knowledge. London: Macmillan Press Limited, 1974.

Borroso, Silvano. A History of Philosophy for (almost) Everyone Rome: Palulines, 2007

Completion, Frederick A History of Philosophy. New York: A Division of Doubleday and Company Inc, 1979

Descartes, Rene. Discourse on the Methods and Meditation. London: The Chaucer Press Limited, 1908

Halverson, H. William. A Concise Introduction to Philosophy. New York: Random House, 1981.

Hayek, F. A. (2013). The use of knowledge in society. In Modern understandings of liberty and property (pp. 27-38), Routledge.

Hopkins, H. Richard, and Stroll Aurum. Philosophy is made simple. London: Oxford University Press, 1969

Hume, David. An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1977

Ingham, Kenneth. The Kingdom of Toro in Uganda. London: Harper and Row Publishers, 1975

Kaufmann, Walter: Philosophical Classics. Vol. II, 1964.

Kiwanuka, M.S.M. The kings of Buganda. Nairobi: East African Publishing House, 1969

Leibniz, G.W. Philosophical Writings of Writings of Leibniz. New York: E.P. Dutton and Company Inc, 1934

Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. New York: First Printing Company, 1974

Locke, John. Locke’s Theory of Knowledge and its Historical Relations. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1968

Locke, John, Berkeley George, Hume David. The Empiricists. New York: Anchor Press, 1964.

Marshall, J. John Locke: resistance, religion, and responsibility. Cambridge University Press, 1994.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598531

Morris, H.F. A History of Ankole. (Nairobi: East African Institute Press, 1962.

Marušić, J. S. (2021). Locke on knowledge and certainty. In The Lockean Mind (pp. 66-72). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315099675-14

Ogot, B.A. A History of Southern Luo. Nairobi: East African Institute Press, 1967

Rubaraza, Samwiri. A History of the Kingdom of Ankole. London: Clarendonn Press, 1971

Sasan, J. M. V. The Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke: Comparative Analysis, 2021. https://doi.org/10.34293/sijash.v9i1.4042

Tipton, I. (2012). Locke: knowledge and its limits. In British Philosophy and the Age of Enlightenment (pp. 69-95). Routledge.

Uzgalis, W. (2001). John Locke.

Walsh, J. Martin. A History of Philosophy, London: Biddles, 1967.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-16

How to Cite

Ampaire , I. (2024). JOHN LOCKE’S THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE IN RELATION TO THE BATAGWENDA PEOPLE. A CASE OF KICHECHE SUB-COUNTY, KITAGWENDA DISTRICT, UGANDA. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 5(12), 10. https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v5i12.1443

Issue

Section

Section of Social Sciences and Humanities