The influence of cultural beliefs and practices on latrine access and utilization in Awerial County, South Sudan. A cross-sectional study.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i9.2170Keywords:
Cultural beliefs, Sanitation practices, Latrine utilization, Open defecation, Hygiene behavior, Awerial County, South SudanAbstract
Background.
Lack of latrines remains a widespread health and environmental hazard in many developing countries. The study aims to assess the influence of cultural beliefs and practices on latrine utilization in Awerial County, South Sudan.
Methodology.
A Descriptive Analytical study design was utilized for the study. Awerial County was purposively selected based on its low latrine coverage within the state. Systematic random sampling of households was conducted. Quantitative data were collected from 384 community members who were interviewed using a structured household questionnaire. Qualitative data were collected through Focused Group Discussions and Key Informant Interviews. Findings are presented as numerical summaries, tables, and charts.
Results.
Majority of household heads are female 76.3% (293), 66.1% (254), reported that they do not have a latrine in their homes, a significant portion of respondent’s lack knowledge (mean 2.02, 29.7%) and resources (49.2%) for latrine usage, cultural beliefs (10.9%) was, perceived as influential, Cultural practices hindering latrine use are rare (0.5%), and responsibilities for latrine maintenance are shared among children, women, men, and others. Pearson correlation coefficient of -0.396 suggests a moderate negative correlation, meaning that as the lack of resources and knowledge about latrine construction increases, the probability of having a latrine decreases. The p-value (Sig. = 0.000) confirms that this result is statistically significant, meaning the observed relationship is unlikely to be due to chance.
Conclusion
The findings from Awerial County underscore the critical interplay between cultural beliefs, gender dynamics, environmental challenges, and the effectiveness of sanitation interventions to address factors like the lack of availability of resources and knowledge for latrine construction.
Recommendation
The study suggests creating campaigns to dispel myths and misconceptions, and providing resources and knowledge for latrine construction as one of the most important approaches to improve sanitation.
References
Dreibelbis, R., Hulland, K.R.S., Ram, P.K., Unicomb, L., Winch, P.J., Leontsini, E., et al. (2021). The Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene: A framework for developing and accessing behavior change interventions in contexts with limited infrastructure.
Guo, A., Kayser, G., Bartram, J., & Bowling, J.M. (2020). A cross-sectional study conducted in Ethiopia, Kenya, Mozambique, Rwanda, Uganda, and Zambia examining water, sanitation, and hygiene practices in rural health care facilities. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 97(4), 1033–1042. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0208
Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Acts Press.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. UN General Assembly. Retrieved from Refworld. https://doi.org/10.18356/84e5e905-en
World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund. (2023). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene 2000–2023: Special focus on inequalities. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (JMP). https://www.who.int/publications
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2022). Sanitation statistics: Insights into global and regional trends. UNICEF. Retrieved from https://data.unicef.org/topic/water-and-sanitation/sanitation/
Azanaw, J., Malede, A., Yalew, H. F., & Worede, E. A. (2024). Determinants of diarrhoeal diseases among under-five children in Africa (2013–2023): A comprehensive systematic review highlighting geographic variances, socioeconomic influences, and environmental factors. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 2399. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19962-0
Barrington, D. J., Sindall, R. C., Chinyama, A., Morse, T., Sule, M. N., Beale, J., Kativhu, T., Krishnan, S., Luwe, K., Malolo, R. D., Mcharo, O., Odili, A. C., Ravndal, K. T., Rose, J., Shaylor, E., Wozei, E., Chikwezga, F., & Evans, B. E. (2025). The persistence of failure in water, sanitation, and hygiene programming: A qualitative study. BMJ Global Health, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016354
Robinson, H. J., Barrington, D., Evans, B., Hutchings, P., & Narayanaswamy, L. (2024). An analysis of gender inclusion in Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) projects: Intention vs. reality. Development Policy Review, 42(2), e12741. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12741
Saleem, M., Burdett, T., & Heaslip, V. (2019). Health and social impacts of open defecation on women: A systematic review. BMC Public Health, 19, 158. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6423-z
Trajano Gomes da Silva, D., Dias, E., Ebdon, J., & Taylor, H. (2018). Assessment of recommended approaches for containment and safe handling of human excreta in emergency settings. PLoS ONE, 13(7), e0201344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201344
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdalla Benard Oliver James Abdalla, Dr. Denis Mubiru, Dr. Kateregga Salongo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
