From lectures to flipped classroom: A quasi-experimental crossover study on students’ performance and perceptions in learning histology.

Authors

  • Dr. Kavya Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, India.
  • Dr. Geetha Saraswathy Pitchandy Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, India.
  • Dr. Ramesh Bindinganabile RangaIyengar Professor & HOD, Department of Anatomy, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, India.
  • Dr. Sharmadha Kodur LaxmiNarayana Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G. Nagar, India.
  • Dr . Yogi Anupkumar Balakrishnan Professor, Department of Anatomy, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i9.2079

Keywords:

Anatomy education, Histology, Flipped classroom, Didactic lecture, medical students, Active learning, Knowledge retention, Teaching methodology

Abstract

Background:

Anatomy education has traditionally relied on didactic lectures, but innovative approaches such as the flipped classroom are increasingly being explored to promote active learning, engagement, and deeper understanding.

 Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the flipped classroom compared to traditional lectures in teaching histology to first-year MBBS students.

 Methods:

A quasi-experimental crossover study was conducted among 150 first-year MBBS students. Two histology topics (stomach and small intestine) were taught using the flipped classroom and didactic lecture methods. Pre-test, mid-test, and post-test scores were recorded using multiple-choice questionnaires. Group A initially underwent flipped classroom teaching, and Group B didactic lectures for Topic 1, followed by crossover for Topic 2. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and independent t-tests.

 Results:

The participants comprised 150 first-year MBBS students (52% female; mean age 19.4 ± 0.8 years). Both teaching methods significantly improved student performance. Didactic lectures showed greater short-term gains (mean post-test = 9.48 ± 1.33 vs. 8.92 ± 1.73; p < 0.05). The flipped classroom group demonstrated a steady incremental improvement from pre-test (6.98 ± 1.94) to mid-test (7.25 ± 2.17) and post-test (8.92 ± 1.73), confirming progressive learning and retention (p < 0.001).

 Conclusion:

Didactic lectures remain effective for achieving rapid short-term learning gains, whereas the flipped classroom fosters gradual improvement, learner autonomy, and deeper engagement.

 Recommendations:

A blended, context-sensitive approach integrating both lectures and flipped classroom strategies is recommended to optimize learning outcomes in anatomy education. Future studies should assess long-term knowledge retention, adaptability, and the role of technology-enabled blended models across diverse medical curricula.

Author Biographies

Dr. Kavya, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, India.

is an Associate Professor in the Department of Anatomy at Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, under Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences. She completed her MBBS from KVG Medical College, Sullia (2009) and MD in Anatomy from Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore (2016). With over 10 years of teaching experience and 10 publications in reputed journals, she has significantly contributed to academics and research in anatomical sciences. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9887-0202)

Dr. Geetha Saraswathy Pitchandy, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, India.

is an Associate Professor of Anatomy at Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore. She obtained her MBBS degree from Tirunelveli Medical College (2001) and MD in Anatomy from Narayana Medical College (2009). With 6 years of teaching experience and 3 international publications, she is committed to strengthening anatomical education and guiding budding doctors. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4238-6658)

Dr. Ramesh Bindinganabile RangaIyengar , Professor & HOD, Department of Anatomy, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore, India.

is Professor and Head of the Department of Anatomy at Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Medical College, Bangalore. He completed his MBBS from Bangalore Medical College (1984) and MS in Anatomy from Mysore Medical College (1989). With nearly 40 years of teaching and research experience, Dr. Ramesh is widely respected for his academic contributions, research guidance, and publications in anatomical sciences. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4277-5298)

Dr. Sharmadha Kodur LaxmiNarayana , Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G. Nagar, India.

is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Anatomy at Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G. Nagar, affiliated with Adichunchanagiri University. She holds a B.Sc. in Genetics from Bangalore University (2008) and an M.Sc. in Medical Anatomy from Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore (2011). With 12 years of teaching experience, she is currently pursuing her PhD in Anatomy and has 10 publications in international journals. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2131-8902)

Dr . Yogi Anupkumar Balakrishnan, Professor, Department of Anatomy, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya, India.

is a Professor of Anatomy at Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, Mandya. He completed his MBBS (2010) and MD in Anatomy (2016) from A.J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Mangalore. With 8 years of teaching experience, he has published 7 international research articles, including 3 indexed in Scopus. (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5968-342X)

References

Hampel GA, Shekhawat D, Chaiyamoon A, Cardona JJ, Carrera A, Reina F, et al. The superior vesical artery: a review of conflicting definitions and how these could affect invasive procedures. Clin Anat. 2023;36(6):958-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.24084

Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.

Prober CG, Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures--a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1657-9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1202451

Singh K, Mahajan R, Gupta P, Singh T. Flipped Classroom: A Concept for Engaging Medical Students in Learning. Indian Pediatr. 2018;55(6):507-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-018-1342-0

Phillips J, Wiesbauer F. The flipped classroom in medical education: A new standard in teaching. Trends Anaesth Crit Care. 2022;42:4-8. doi:10.1016/j.tacc.2022.01.001. PMID:38620968; PMCID:PMC9764229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tacc.2022.01.001

Joseph MA, Roach EJ, Natarajan J, Karkada S, Cayaban AR. The flipped classroom improves Omani nursing students' performance and satisfaction in anatomy and physiology. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-00515-w

Khayat M, Hafezi F, Asgari P, Talebzadeh Shoushtari M. Comparison of the effectiveness of flipped classroom and traditional teaching method on the components of self-determination and class perception among university students. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2021;9(4):230-7. doi:10.30476/JAMP.2021.89793.1385. PMID:34692861; PMCID:PMC8521212.

Prober CG, Khan S. Medical education reimagined: a call to action. Acad Med. 2013;88(10):1407-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a368bd

McLaughlin JE, Roth MT, Glatt DM, Gharkholonarehe N, Davidson CA, Griffin LM, et al. The flipped classroom: a course redesign to foster learning and engagement in a health professions school. Acad Med. 2014;89(2):236-43. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000086

Hew KF, Lo CK. Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18(1):38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z

Kaur M, Manna S, Ahluwalia H, Bhattacharjee M. Flipped Classroom (FCR) as an Effective Teaching-Learning Module for a Large Classroom: A Mixed-Method Approach. Cureus. 2022;14(8):e28173. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.28173

Jha S, Sethi R, Kumar M, Khorwal G. Comparative Study of the Flipped Classroom and Traditional Lecture Methods in Anatomy Teaching. Cureus. 2024;16(7):e64378. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64378

Premchand SA, Naik K, Bhonsle S. Effectiveness and perception of flipped classroom over didactic lectures in teaching embryology among first year medical students: A comparative study. Res J Med Sci. 2024;18:343-6. doi:10.36478/makrjms.2024.10.343.346.

Afshar M, Zarei A, Moghaddam MR, Shoorei H. Flipped and peer-assisted teaching: a new model in virtual anatomy education. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:722. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05697-4

Nanjundaiah K, Komala, Anuradha HV. Comparison of flipped classroom versus traditional didactic lectures among medical students: A mixed-method study. Natl J Clin Anat. 2024;13(1):41-4. https://doi.org/10.4103/NJCA.NJCA_184_23

Gopalan C, Bruno EL, Daughrity SE, Nguyen K-LT. Flipping the anatomy classroom: a comparative analysis of 16-week and 8-week courses in a community college. Front Educ. 2024;9:1389825. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1389825

Salinas-Álvarez Y, Quiroga-Garza A, Martínez-Garza JH, Jacobo-Baca G, Zárate-Garza PP, Rodríguez-Alanís KV, et al. Mexican educators' survey on anatomical sciences education and a review of world tendencies. Anat Sci Educ. 2021;14(4):471-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2017

Downloads

Published

2025-09-13

How to Cite

Dr. Kavya, Pitchandy, D. G. S., RangaIyengar , D. R. B. ., LaxmiNarayana, D. S. K. . ., & Balakrishnan, D. . Y. A. . (2025). From lectures to flipped classroom: A quasi-experimental crossover study on students’ performance and perceptions in learning histology. Student’s Journal of Health Research Africa, 6(9), 13. https://doi.org/10.51168/sjhrafrica.v6i9.2079

Issue

Section

Section of Anatomy & Physiology